Women praying at St. Michael's Cathedral during a diaconate ordination ceremony in 2012. Bob Brehl it is time to rethink the role of women in Church. Catholic Register file photo

Time to rethink role of women in Church

By 
  • May 26, 2016

Does anybody today believe men are intellectually superior to women because of their gender? The question is not about the intelligence of an individual man or woman, but collectively. Simply put: if you have the Y chromosome does it make you smarter?

When posed that way, it sounds utterly preposterous. If there is someone out there who truly believes one gender is inherently and genetically intellectually superior to the other, please enlighten me as to your reasons.

This brings us to Pope Francis and all the fuss about his offer to study whether or not women should have greater roles in the Church, including the possibility of ordaining female deacons. The time is right, as Francis suggests, to do a thorough study of women’s place in the Church and on the altar.

Conservatives reacted in horror, fearing the slippery slope toward the ordination of women priests, while liberals metaphorically (or perhaps literally) danced a jig. The reality of Francis’ comments and what comes of them is likely somewhere between those two extremes.

By way of background, the New Testament tells us the role of the deacon was created by the apostles so they could deploy ministers or designates to do charitable works while they focused on preaching. Over the centuries, the role of deacon was eventually subsumed into the priesthood and hierarchy. Then in the 1960s, the Second Vatican Council revived the diaconate as an ordained order open to “mature” men over 35, who can be married.

With the reinstallment of the diaconate, there’s long been an argument that women should be included because early Church sources mention women as deacons centuries ago and today many duties performed by nuns are comparable to deacons’ work. 

It remains to be seen exactly which direction the results of such a study mentioned by Francis will lead the Church. But one thing seems pretty certain: Wherever the discussion of women deacons winds up, it will clarify exactly what areas are open to women in the Church and explain why or why not.

Another point to consider is that in a society that demands equality, it will become increasingly difficult to persuade young women to stick with the Church under the status quo.

I certainly acknowledge it is important for the 2,000-year-old Church to withstand cultural whims of the day, but the changing role of women in society is not a whim. It is a fact. As humans, we have evolved and there’s no turning back the clock. Pope Francis has assessed the social landscape and seems to understand the Church must find a way for men and women to move forward on more level footing.

Do we not want the brightest and sharpest minds — male and female — working within the Church as equals to make it stronger and more important in today’s world; a world that often seems to want to knock it down piece by piece? Why would the Church choose to restrict key decision makers and their ideas to only half the talent pool? These are some of the questions likely to be asked if Francis’ suggestions are put to formal study.

Some may argue that intellect is not the sole requirement for ordination. That’s a worthy point to examine. When it comes to pastoral care,  empathy, patience, understanding and a willingness to listen are also essential. Anyone who would argue men are generally better at those things than women would have a difficult time defending his position.

There are also deep theological questions involved in expanding the roles of women. For example, because priests act “in persona Christi” or in the place of Jesus in performing all the sacraments, there’s the argument only men can do it because Jesus was a man.

As I’ve often written, I’m no theologian, but I don’t get the restriction based on Jesus’ gender. I bet lots of people in the pews don’t get it either. Hopefully, a papal commission will address why women could not be in persona Christi simply because their earthly bodies do not have the Y chromosome like Jesus had.

Soon after the Pope agreed to set up a commission to examine whether women should be ordained as deacons, Vatican spokesman Fr. Federico Lombardi clarified Francis’ comments. “The Pope did not say he intends to introduce a diaconal ordination for women and even less did he speak of the priestly ordination of women. In fact, talking about preaching during the eucharistic celebration, he let them know that he was not considering this possibility at all.”

Ordaining women as deacons would not necessarily lead to overturning the ban on women priests, just as ordaining married deacons has not led to eliminating the rule of celibacy for priests. But what Francis has done is open up dialogue.

That’s a good thing, especially because for years clergy were forbidden to even discuss the ordination of women.

(Brehl is a writer in Port Credit, Ont., and can be reached at bob@abc2.ca or @bbrehl on Twitter.)

Leave your comments

Post comment as a guest

0 / 300 Character restriction
Your text should be less than 300 characters
Your comments are subject to administrator's moderation.

People in this conversation

  • The writer did not even consider the concepts of fatherhood and motherhood in his analysis. They are not interchangeable roles. If he would examine the statistics, motherhood is in serious decline. We are not even replacing our population. If role of women today is irreversible we are in trouble.

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • Another issue is the raising of children by daycare and otherwise lack of a mother's attention to their children because they are so wrapped up in their careers and competing with men. I don't subscribe to this concept of the irreversible roles of women. It's saying the culture sets the agenda.

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • Thank you, Robert, I have written very similar blogs to that effect. I agree with you 100%

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • Father Ron Smith

    Jesus Christ, in his full humanity, did not share his intrinsic divinity with males only, but with all the human race - half of which is female. Therefore, 'persona Christi' must surely be recognised in both women and men. If Christ as a man were to represent only males; where would women feature?

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • Luis Gutierrez

    Yes, it is time! This entire issue is about whether or not all men and women share one and the same human nature assumed by the eternal Word at the incarnation. The eternally begotten Word was not a male before the incarnation, so his masculinity is not essential for the redemption.

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • Luis Gutierrez

    Yes, it is time! This entire issue is about whether or not all men and women share one and the same human nature assumed by the eternal Word at the incarnation. The eternally begotten Word was not a male before the incarnation, so his masculinity is not essential for the redemption.

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • Paul Griffiths

    This column is filled with non-sequiturs and red herrings ("women are smart too!", "we have evolved!", "if society changes, the church must mirror it!")

    This is a very unserious engagement with a serious issue. The author needs to grow up and attempt to make a mature argument.

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • Anne

    Women have been on the altar since Vatican II, both as lectors, extraordinary Eucharistic ministers and as altar girls. Having been a lector in the past I now realize that the "feminization" of the Church has driven men away from the Church. My sisters, humble yourselves - womens' lib is deception

    Like 0 Short URL: