Before that step is taken in historical revisionism, city councillors might at least pay respects to the man once considered a founding father of this Keystone Province.
Who was Bishop Grandin?
Vital-Justin Grandin was a Roman Catholic priest who played a major role in the transformation of what was largely a thinly populated wilderness into the vibrant province that we inhabit today.
He was an unlikely hero. Poor health and a speech impediment hindered his career, and he ended up in our cold northwest, where he developed an immediate and long-lasting affinity for Indigenous people.
In fact, he adopted two Indigenous orphans, and during that time, he formulated the idea that motivated him for the rest of his life. Simply put, he saw no reason why priests had to be white men. He enthusiastically promoted education, in large part so that Indigenous men could become priests and societal leaders.
It needs to be remembered that Roman Catholicism was extremely important in early Manitoba life. And when Grandin arrived in what would become the “postage stamp province,” the area was predominantly Roman Catholic. The dominant Indigenous group, the Ojibway, had emigrated from the Great Lakes area around the same time as the Selkirk Settlers and had displaced the relatively few Assiniboine who had hunted in the area.
It was in this fascinating Métis/Indigenous/Selkirk Settler tapestry that Grandin unleashed his amazing energy. Education and Roman Catholicism were his twin passions. He was convinced that education was vital if Indigenous and Métis people were to succeed. Edward Cunningham, the first Métis priest in the northwest, was Grandin’s crowning success. Until his poor health stopped him for good, Grandin built, and kept building, the structure that became modern Manitoba.
Apparently, the reason Grandin’s name is to be expunged permanently from Canadian history books is because he supported residential schools for Indigenous children. But in his defence, Grandin had absolutely no idea that school children would be subjected to abuse 50 or 100 years after he was gone. And Grandin always believed that Indigenous parents should decide whether or not to send their child to a residential school. During Grandin’s time, attendance at residential schools was entirely up to the Indigenous parents. Compulsory school attendance was not introduced until long after his death.
So, there’s that.
And it is absolutely true that Grandin and Louis Riel despised one another. Grandin thought Riel was a madman, but he was not alone in this assessment.
But if Grandin’s name is to be erased from history, let’s remember his full name: “Vital-Justin Grandin.” That’s right, St. Vital, a neighbourhood in Winnipeg, was named for him. So, to be consistent, St. Vital will have to be renamed as well.
And what about Tache, Des Meurons, Dorchester, Lagimodiere and a few hundred other historical figures? If we are to judge yesterday’s leaders by today’s standards, every one of those names will be unsuitable. Every man, woman and child who lived a hundred or more years ago is guilty of thinking and acting like a person of their time, and not as a person of our “enlightened” time.
We might even have to take a look at names like Chief Peguis. Many tribes practised polygamy, the buying and selling of wives, slavery, ritual torture and bloody warfare. If we judge yesterday’s leaders, like Grandin, by today’s standards, should we not judge Indigenous leaders, like Peguis, by the same standards?
The answer is to recognize that Grandin and Peguis were both good men — but men of their time.
Manitoba has an honourable history. Grandin and Peguis both played an honourable part.
Reconciliation is a worthy goal. But it won’t be achieved by rewriting history.
(Brian Giesbrecht, a retired judge, is a Senior Fellow at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy. © Troy Media)