exclamation

Important notice: To continue serving our valued readers during the postal disruption, complete unrestricted access to the digital edition is available at no extra cost. This will ensure uninterrupted digital access to your copies. Click here to view the digital edition, or learn more.

Corpus Christi reminds us that the Eucharist is the Church’s greatest treasure and not an entitlement. CNS photo/Leslie E. Kossoff

Eucharist is not an entitlement

By 
  • June 4, 2015

On the solemn feast of Corpus Christi a counterintuitive thought occurs: Are too many people receiving Holy Communion too often?

As this feast of the Body and Blood of the Lord Jesus falls between the two Synods on the Family, the thought occurs because of the great preoccupation with the question of Holy Communion for the divorced and civilly remarried.

The teaching and practice of the Church is rather clear. In order to receive Holy Communion, a Catholic must be in a state of grace, meaning that no mortal sins have been committed. If one is in a state of mortal sin, then it is necessary to have those sins forgiven in the Sacrament of Reconciliation before receiving Holy Communion. That discipline is based on the clear teaching of St. Paul, who says that to receive the Eucharist unworthily is to invite condemnation (1 Corinthians 11:29).

The situation of the divorced and civilly remarried is as follows. Having contracted a valid marriage, they are now living in a conjugal union with another person. Though they may not regard it is as such, they are in an adulterous union, as indicated by the words of Jesus Himself (Mark 10:11-12; Matthew 19:8-9).

As adultery is a mortal sin, the civil remarriage — which is not a marriage at all in the eyes of God — precludes reception of Holy Communion. The serious sin of adultery, like all sins, cannot be forgiven in the Sacrament of Reconciliation unless there is a purpose of amendment. So just as one cohabiting in a conjugal relationship outside of marriage cannot not be forgiven in the Sacrament of Reconciliation if he neither desires nor intends to cease the sinful behaviour, so too a civilly remarried person cannot be absolved in confession if he does not intend to end the non-valid “marriage.”

Digital Columnists

The article you have requested is only available to subscribers of the Catholic Register.


There are two ways to read this article.

1. Subscribe to our digital edition and read the complete newspaper, plus additional features, on your PC, laptop or tablet.  Subscription rates start at just $3.99.

2. Subscribe to our weekly newspaper and have the print edition delivered right to you door each week.



Please support The Catholic Register

Unlike many media companies, The Catholic Register has never charged readers for access to the news and information on our website. We want to keep our award-winning journalism as widely available as possible. But we need your help.

For more than 125 years, The Register has been a trusted source of faith-based journalism. By making even a small donation you help ensure our future as an important voice in the Catholic Church. If you support the mission of Catholic journalism, please donate today. Thank you.

DONATE