hand and heart

The recent post office troubles have impacted our regular fundraising efforts. Please consider supporting the Register and Catholic journalism by using one of the methods below:

  • Donate online
  • Donate by e-transfer to accounting@catholicregister.org
  • Donate by telephone: 416-934-3410 ext. 406 or toll-free 1-855-441-4077 ext. 406
Canada's Supreme Court justices pose for a photo at the Supreme Court of Canada in Ottawa Feb. 16. From left, the justices in the front row are: Marie Deschamps, William Ian Corneil Binnie, Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin, Louis LeBel and Morris Fish. Back row: Marshall Rothstein, Rosalie Silberman Abella, Louise Charron and Thomas Cromwell. CNS photo/Adrian Wyld, Reuters

What exactly did Loyola College win?

By 
  • April 16, 2015

Now that I am under no professional obligation to read court decisions, I generally avoid them. The turgid prose, the unctuous self-regard and the complacent sense of judicial superiority I find unpleasant and soporific.

But I made an exception and read the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in the Loyola College case because it is being hailed by many Christians as a victory for religious freedom. Not so fast, I say.
Loyola is a Catholic boy’s high school. Since the school’s founding in the 1840s it has been administered by the Jesuits.

Most students who attend Loyola come from Catholic homes.

Since 2008, the Quebec Minister of Education has required all schools to teach a program called Ethics and Religious Culture (ERC), a program that seeks to inculcate in  students “openness to human rights, diversity and respect for others.” The ERC program requires teaching of world religions, ethics and (that old chestnut of desiccated liberalism) “dialogue.” Those who teach the ERC program must not advance the truth of any religion.

Only a skilled judicial contortionist could reconcile this mandate with the catechism and the mission of the Roman Catholic Church (whose founder, I recall, did not say: “No one comes to the Father but by comparative religion”).

Nevertheless our elite judges on the Supreme Court, who have spent a lifetime reconciling the irreconcilable, considered themselves up to the task.

Digital Columnists

The article you have requested is only available to subscribers of the Catholic Register.


There are two ways to read this article.

1. Subscribe to our digital edition and read the complete newspaper, plus additional features, on your PC, laptop or tablet.  Subscription rates start at just $3.99.

2. Subscribe to our weekly newspaper and have the print edition delivered right to you door each week.

Please support The Catholic Register

Unlike many media companies, The Catholic Register has never charged readers for access to the news and information on our website. We want to keep our award-winning journalism as widely available as possible. But we need your help.

For more than 125 years, The Register has been a trusted source of faith-based journalism. By making even a small donation you help ensure our future as an important voice in the Catholic Church. If you support the mission of Catholic journalism, please donate today. Thank you.

DONATE